Victor and Socrates

In what ways does the novel present knowledge as dangerous and destructive?

Knowledge is what can be understood. People encounter knowledge whenever they learn or teach. Knowledge makes people have a fuller grasp on what happened, is happening or will happen. In Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein wants to create life and does not know what that action could cause. Mary Shelley, the author of Frankenstein, demonstrates danger by showing how knowledge of the truth behind a situation can cause both mental and physical effects.

Mary Shelley, the author of Frankenstein, demonstrates knowledge by showing how it can prepare one for destruction. When at university, Victor decides he wants to create life. Victor knows that his dark arts will not be welcomed so he puts himself into a secluded place to make his attempt on life. Literally expressed by the evidence is that Frankenstein instinctively knows that his endeavours are improper so he goes to great lengths to conceal himself. The evidence signifies, in context of the plot and character, that Victor is well aware that he is doing something that is unnatural and knows that if he is caught, he will be stopped. As a result of this he takes precautions against discovery. Through life, one has both wants and needs. Occasionally, they pull us in opposite directions. The reason this is important is because, if one chooses to indulge in one’s wants, one must leave a path for what is needed, specifically by leaving themselves open to others that can, and will, drag them out of their unhealthy behaviour. By creating a means of escape, oneself will not spiral into addiction or obsession of that immoral act.

Demonstrated in the novel Frankenstein by author Mary Shelley, is how knowledge can be dangerous to one physically. Victor had recently achieved his goal of creating life and was horrified. He ran away and became ill because he knew that such a creature, as the one he created, existed. Knowing that life was created and knowing what it was like made Frankenstein sick, this is literally expressed in the evidence. Signified in context of the plot and the characters is that knowledge can have physical implications as is seen in the fact that Victor created life, beheld it and, due to that, fell sick. It is important because when one witnesses something or has knowledge on specific topics, they can obtain physical signs. Just as individuals have physical reactions to the emotions of happiness (smiling) and sadness (crying), guilt can also affect one physically.

The author of Frankenstein, Mary Shelley, demonstrates knowledge by showing how is can destroy one from the inside. After the death of William, Victor returns to Geneva to grieve his brother and discovers the verdict for Justine. Frankenstein speaks of how he knows that his monster killed William and how he would be responsible for the deaths of both William and Justine. The evidence literally expresses that Victor is aware of the cause of his brother’s death and ,as he cannot (or will not) say anything, he allows his maid to be killed as well. The evidence signifies how Victor Frankenstein’s knowledge of the monster, one that has led to the destruction of two of his loved ones, gives him a great amount of guilt which lays heavily upon him. It is important because the knowledge an individual has causes them to view situations in a different light and understand happenings which can cause them to feel bad within themselves. As people go through life and they learn through what they experience, those experiences enter their mind and are both analyzed within their current thought-process and help shape a new one that alters how they see future events.

Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, demonstrates how knowledge can be destructive to the one that possesses it. While Victor Frankenstein was creating the monster, he knew his actions were inappropriate. This knowledge led him to bypass the safety that would come from another being aware of his plans. As a result of this, he allowed his family to be destroyed and he damaged his mind. This can be seen in the guilt he feels over Ernest’s younger brother and Justine and as he becomes paranoid. It is important for an individual to remember that what they know can hurt them.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

3 thoughts on “Victor and Socrates

  1. Dear IB(Boobu)

    You did a wonderful job exploring how Mary Shelley discussed the danger of knowledge in Frankenstein. Danger is very prevalent when it comes to new fields in science and experimentation. Dangers can include the result of the experiment itself and as you said the ethics of what has been observed. I would almost worry how close both are in their severity. One seems to be catastrophic; you engineer a lethal disease that can wipe out the population. The other can be categorized as the societal reaction to the experiment. Society can label the scientist as evil, corrupt or foolish for their actions and become a villain in history for their unethical actions. I would say this also includes the guilt one harbours with dabbling in unethical research as you also have suggested above. With a degree of brevity you have captured the major issues with knowledge in scientific research and I think this is my feedback as well.
    It appeared that you started to develop your own opinions at the end of your paragraphs but they ended abruptly. I would have loved to hear more about your response to these issues in response to the text.
    As well you used the same format in each paragraph such as “In context of the plot and characters.” I was curious as to why you repeated the same phrase three times.

    Well done, well constructed and argued ideas and continue to write to your heart’s desire,
    Lord Drysdale

    1. Dear Lord Drysdale,
      Thank you for you comment. You brought up a point I had not even thought of: That the physical act itself and all of its non-physical effects can be as bad as each other. The sentence containing the word brevity confused me a bit. I will see if I can dig up anything else that I can add to satisfy your want to hear more. As for your last point, that phrase is from the TIQA format from grade 9 and just for you I will alter it. Overall thank you for your comment and thank you for reading my reply to your previous comment and being more specific.
      Sincerely, bUbU

  2. Dear IB.,
    You’re okay. Your arguments in your first and third body paragraphs are pretty smart.
    Now to the criticism, your beginning was choppy and when you were talking about the book, you used present tense. Your thesis was extremely broad so you might want to fix that up. Take the text out of your topic sentence and put it into your transition/summary. You put a space before your comma and not after it. What were you thinking. The second last sentence in your conclusion needs to be rearranged. You should include the idea of guilt in your introduction.
    Keep working man, you will get there eventually.
    Sincerely, IB.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *